> I'd be interested in running a gig PA with that smaller generator of his. > Then I'd know it's all useful. I still can't believe that none of these > people ever organize a "plug your phone in here to charge it" type > demonstrations. It's always good to have them do something understandable, > some work which a layman can comprehend. They can comprehend solar > umbrella charging stations at festivals, cos they can plug in their mobile > devices and have them charged. While it's probably great to sell to > customers who give you a load o' money for a large device, sometimes > thinking small is worth it too. >
I have previously suggested a much better demo for Rossi. He should let himself be flown to a high mountain top cabin or tent up in the Alps with a couple of E-cats (one as a spare), some hydrogen and nickel, and food and water. No heater. No stove. No warm clothes... in fact preferably no clothes at all. I'd give him an emergency radio. Let's see how long he stays during a cold winter. You call me a staunch believer. That is decidedly weird. Can you not > comprehend that some can be optimistic, positive and hopeful for new > technologies, be they coming from Thane C. Heins, Steorn, Andrea Rossi, > John Bedini or any of the other people, yet still want to invest in devices > only after they're available and do provable work? I can't understand being optimistic about any of these people because they have no credible evidence that anything they do works. Bedini's stuff can't and doesn't work -- it's "free energy" from magnets. That's just bulldokey. I'd have to look up Heins but I think it's in the same category and you already what I think of Steorn and exactly why. > I suppose you can't comprehend why I'm hopeful and see promise, for the > same reason as I can't understand your emotionally hostile attitude towards > Rossi, replete with sarcastic "humor", ad hominem attacks and, frankly put, > pointless hatred. You're the same as you were with Steorn. > Right. In Steorn's case, please explain to me why they took 20+ million Euros of investor money and made dozens of claims and promises not a one of which ever was proven true to this very day. I guess the main problem with all of this stuff is that noone has done a > good, solid website presentation on a device which is already finished and > can be purchased by consumers. Until someone does that, none of the others > will know better - they'll still be picking the brightest cyan background > and that cool looking Comic Sans font. > You're joking, yes? I can't really tell. It's not these people's web sites that are the problem!
