On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> This is true that the Rossi's effect is trivial to demonstrate
> unconditionally. But this is also the reason, that Rossi has not had
> any interests to provide conclusive evidence to the public.



Speculation about reverse psychology and mind games are pointless. If you
agree that Rossi has not proved his claims, then I can't see why you would
accept them.

Reply via email to