I think Mary needs to prove to us that she knows anything about calorimetry and has published on the subject. I have seen no evidence at all. Why is she more believable than Rossi?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Nov 19, 2011 3:59 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Detailed exposed of the e-cat scam. Mary wrote: »I have performed and published highly reliable results of research involving calorimetry.» But not with ecat. It is difficult to have understanding what is relevant and what is not. In steam calorimetry there is only one necessary variable relevant to be measured (i.e. steam pressure). === Also, Rossi has not forbid anyone to check the calibration of the calorimetry. No observers (or even skeptics) have asked Rossi to have the calorimetry calibrated. Even thermometers were calibrated only once in April although this should have been the basic laboratory procedure. Calorimetry was never requested to be calibrated and how could observers have been able to request calibration of calorimetry if they all (expect Lewan once) failed to check the calibration of thermometer? —Jouni
