All I requested is for you to show us the proof. Why should we believe anything you say without proof? Please list your references so we can verify your claim of knowledge.
-----Original Message----- From: Mary Yugo <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sat, Nov 19, 2011 9:19 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Detailed exposed of the e-cat scam. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:12 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: I think Mary needs to prove to us that she knows anything about calorimetry and has published on the subject. I have seen no evidence at all. Why is she more believable than Rossi? Try addressing the issues I raised instead of attacking me personally. If I don't know anything about it, the issues won't make sense and are easily refuted. Jouni tried to refute the issues but she got nowhere because I was able to counter her argument point for point. I couldn't do that without knowing calorimetry. You're using the logical fallacy of appeal to authority. Forget that I claim to be an authority. Discuss the points I make instead. Anyway, if I'm not believable that doesn't mean Rossi is. Another logical fallacy. Know which one?
