If cold fusion is ever properly demonstrated, thousands of scientists will want to investigate it just as thousands turned to P&F when they made their initial announcement.
Excess heat, wet steam, and the other legions of nonsense offered to degrade the term cold fusion are not the issue. At the heart of the matter is transmutation of elements without radioactive decay. This miracle is all important. Such wonderment is impossible within the constraints of our current science. I think that this degradation of the term cold fusion is misdirection, prevarication perpetrated by the enemies of the ascent of man, the perpetuators of human misery, and fools bewitched by the simple and ignorant. What is being explored of late under the term LENR is the craftsmanship of nano-technology and the mysticism of quantum mechanics. It is beyond dispute that recent experiment by Miley, and Arata most prominent among others together with the numerous demos by Rossi offer examples of the transmutation of elements that are inconsistent with any theories propounded by the witch doctors at CERN. Many billions of euros have been dumped into the big science machines in Europe and America to find the Higgs boson keystone that would purport to validate the current thinking in the science of the small. But this make or break concept has not been found as real and will not be found so the scientific work of decades will eventually fall. But science has a chance to open a new door into reality which the power barons which now bestride, smother and strangle science will not allow to be explored. What is your opinion on that? Should human ignorance persist to advance unending funding of dead end science? If you do, you certainly must draw your paycheck from CERN. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> *From:* Mary Yugo **** >> >> ** ** >> >> >> Are you always this flippant with your logical deductions - when faced >> with the inadequacy of the same old lame argument that we have been hearing >> for weeks? I suppose you realize that fewer and fewer participants here are >> taking your seriously anymore – so why not play the fool.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> What it means, of course, is that getting clean cost effective energy >> from non-combustion, non fission sources is extremely difficult, and >> requires proper funding levels.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Conventional science has not only failed society badly in this regard, >> many of the recipients of public largess have actively conspired to keep >> funding away from alternative solutions. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> We cannot really expect the ‘killer paper’ from LENR without a fair >> proportion of that $20 billion… **** >> >> ** ** >> >> … but we might get lucky and get it anyway, and sooner than anyone thinks. >> **** >> >> ** ** >> >> The paper cited in the prior post should have opened up the floodgates of >> funding – as it is almost there - instead you find the opposite happening: >> a good research paper leads to a “circle the wagons mentality” for a few >> thousand high level physicists, who can see their cushy 6 figure incomes >> and stress-free jobs going away, not just away – but the funds being >> transferred to “uncredentialed” inventors and engineers. It has been almost >> a class war type of thing since 1989 - with the Ivory Tower, Ivy League set >> realizing that they are basically unemployable in industry or Public >> Universities - where performance counts - at anywhere near their current >> compensation packages - if the alternatives succeed. >> > > Is that because none of them could use any basic skills in a new > discipline? Did buggy mechanics all die off when cars came out? Of > course not, they switched to working on cars. If cold fusion is ever > properly demonstrated, thousands of scientists will want to investigate it > just as thousands turned to P&F when they made their initial announcement. > The problem was that nobody could replicate what they did and, in the end, > neither could they. >
