Dear Robin. I told mainly what Randy thinks- he has nothing to do with what Rossi (or Piantelli) has As regarding Transition Metals-H LENR (not only Ni works) I think that Piantellis' theory is the most realistic, logically consistent, and confirmed by experiment from the maaaaany theories I have seen in the realm of CF. It is predictive.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:37 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sun, 27 Nov 2011 18:21:47 +0200: > Hi Peter, > >Please do not be surprised, Randy considers that his process > >has nothing to do with Rossi's or Paintelli's. > >And the BLP technology (I still hope to see it working more or less > >publicly this year) is hyperchemistry while Ni-H LENR is nuclear. > > LENR may be both. Hyperchemistry providing much of the energy, with some > of the > shrunken Hydrogen occasionally undergoing a fusion reaction responsible > for the > low level ionizing radiation. Note that when Deuterium is used, the amount > of > actual fusion taking place may be much higher due to the fact that no weak > force > reactions are required, hence the fusion cross section is much higher. > > >other leagues no competition. In case you are interested in details please > >write me privately. > >Peter > [snip] > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
