I think, this says all. This guy is a professional electrochemist and without doubt he has 1000fold more possibilities than I. If he gave up, he has doubts himself. If there is a serious chance for success others should try it, who have a laboratory. Patents dont hinder scientific research and experiments in any way. If somebody finds methods to handle the corrosion he could make additional patents.
This guy found a lot of corrosion that whas not seen or reported before. This means, he found unexpected chemical sources of energy that possibly invalidate previous results and he has not published it. He is scientist and if he would see a chance for an irrefutable scientific proof he would (and should) do this himself. This is what I think about it. Peter ----- Original Nachricht ---- Von: Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 28.11.2011 09:42 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Elevated-temperature excess heat production in a Pd & D system in 1991 > Alternatively you could ask the main author- he is still active/young: > http://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/template2.asp?userID=bliaw > He has continued the work, after Pd with Ni but this was also abandoned. > PeterG > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:34 AM, <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was in the 1990 paper : > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > Liebert's still around : > > > > > > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/fic/F/F199010.PDF > > > > > > > 1990 : EXCESS HEAT USING MOLTEN-SALT ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL > > > > > > > By Professors Liaw, Tao, Turner, & Liebert > > > > > > > > > > > > As an example shown in the last entry in TABLE I, the power to > > > > > > the heating tape was maintained at about 69.25 W, the cell > > > > > > potential was typically in the range of 2.45 V, and the > > > > > > electrochemical input power was about 1.68 W at 692 mA/cm2 > > > > > > for a total input power of about 70.9W. We would expect 1.68 > > > > > > Wof joule heating to result in a 5.1 °C increase in temperature; > > > > > > however, the temperature increased by 82.4° C, which > > > > > > corresponds to a gain of about 27.1 W, according to the > > > > > > calibration curve. Therefore, a net gain of 25.4Wwas in excess, > > > > > > which results in an excess power gain of 1512 percent, in the > > > > > > range of 627 W/cm3 Pd. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Dr. Peter Gluck > > > > > Cluj, Romania > > > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Dr. Peter Gluck > > > Cluj, Romania > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
