Are you saying Levi, Celani, Kullander, Essen,Bianchi, McKubre,Focardi,
etc and Rossi are ALL fools, idiots, liars or incompetents? If you throw
mud at Rossi you throw mud at them as well.
As for our venture, we need to wait for Rossi to post the technical
specification for the high temperature version of the E-Cat before we
present him with a purchase order. We will supply our thermal to Ac kW
gen set and feed part of the output back into the E-Cat while running a
light bank with the excess. To get payment the plant has to run in
closed loop mode, with NO external power applied for 48 hours. Rossi has
in principal agreed to this test with the reservation that as he is not
supplying the heat to Ac conversion gear, he can't guarantee the Ac
output, which is fair enough.
I suspect you have never had any contact with Rossi? I can tell you he
is VERY conservative in his claims. He has NEVER asked for money up
front. Always no money until my plant passes your test, which also meets
his published specifications. There is no fraud or scam here. Where
there is fraud or scam here is in the actions of deniers, some who
refuse to accept the data of fellow scientists and professors and some
who have an agenda to destroy Rossi and the E-Cat by any method or
statement they can dream up like the power meter was placed in HOLD mode
and NO one noticed it. Like NO one would have looked at the input power
meter or noticed the display said HOLD and that it never changed a
single digit for 4.5 hours. Just unbelievable what some non engineers
deniers dream up to support their denier agendas.
The testing methods at the 15 Jan test were fine as they were in the
Kullander and Essen test as they were in the 6 Oct test and in the 28
Oct test. It works as claimed. Time to accept it and to move on to
trying to understand the physics that is occurring.
Here I agree with Larsen that a multi discipline approach is needed to
try to understand what is happening, why transmutations are occurring
and why there are no emitted gamma radiations. Note I said emitted.
Larsen and others suggest they are being generated but are being
internally absorbed and thermalized. Note Celani did say he observed a
short burst of gamma as the reactor first fired up and again as it shut
down as well as he observed a 50% random increase above background gamma
radiation when the reactor was running. This would match with the gamma
being internally thermalized and that sometimes at the start and
shutdown, the internal thermalization process is not as fully functional
as it is when the reactor is running and a few gammas get externally
released as well as the internal thermalization process not being 100%
effective. I'm not a scientists but I am very good at connecting the
dots, in seeing patterns and systemic relationships before others see
them. That is one way I make money.
On 12/11/2011 11:58 PM, Vorl Bek wrote:
The circus is the continual refusal by deniers that call over 1
year of published peer reviewed (Levi, Kullander, Celani, etc)
test data rubbish when it is the deniers that are making up
rubbish claims. You want science? Wait until Rossi sells me a
E-Cat and you can give it your all, that is up to my warranty
limits.
If you are so sure Rossi has the goods, why don't you pay him the
money now - none of that escrow nonsense - in return for a 10
percent discount, or for putting you at the top of the waiting
list - or both?
