Yes, I would expect the pressure to increase slightly until the reactor
reached steady state, but after that, and over the course of 6+ hours, if
mass in NOT= mass out, then pressure would increase to dangerous levels (if
not explosive) since the volume ratio between liquid water and water as
vapor is ~1800.

-m 

 

From: Robert Leguillon [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?

 

Just a thought, FWIW:
The pressure does increase, raising the boiling temperature, decreasing the
primary pump output (remember it decreases with back-pressure) and
eventually it leaks out of the top of the E-Cat. Remember the leaking seals?

  _____  

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:29:17 -0800

Mass in must = mass out, or else pressure inside would steadily increase.

 

From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is so special abbout Rossi?

 

I never found a way to make vapor carry more than 1/10000 of its volume in
liquid when any of its parts are sltighly off horizontal. So, I cannot
convince myself that humidity meters would be useful at all. 

2011/12/11 Mary Yugo <[email protected]>

 

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:

Are you sure Puthoff was so skeptical to start with? He spent more than a
decade spending public money to research paranormal even before meeting Yuri
Geller. 


Neither Targ nor Puthoff were properly skeptical of Geller's ridiculous (and
somewhat silly) claims which were simply sleight of hand ordinary stage
magic.   I did say they were gullible.  What they were not were the things
AG suggested (fools, idiots, liars or incompetents).  Well...  maybe they
were a bit incompetent.  So is someone who measures quality of steam with an
HVAC humidity meter!

 





 

-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ

[email protected]

 

Reply via email to