Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: This sort of claim "Unique to the ET experiments is the use of a new > understanding of wave modulation. Rather than dc, dc + ac, dc pulsed or > bi-level perturbation, the waveforms being subjected (successfully) to test > by ET employ waves fractally nested in a specific non-linear manner > designed to stimulate intrinsic oscillatory processes across a wide range > of scales. . . .
This theory has no bearing on the results. The theory may be wrong, but the technique has been independently tested, and it works. So do several other stimulation techniques such as lasers or a heat pulse. I suppose the theory might be right. There might even be some deep connection between the medical application and cold fusion. That will be for future researchers to discover. That has no bearing on the experimental proof that this technique stimulates the cold fusion reaction. I do not know whether Dardik's medical claims are valid. There is some evidence for them. Dardik has had success with some patients. But I know little about this, and biology is much more complicated than cold fusion, so I cannot judge. Whatever his faults may be, Dardik seem no worse that many mainstream medical researchers. Modern, mainstream medical techniques have often been found to be ineffective. Some were even been shown to be dangerous, such as hormone replacement in menopausal women. In my opinion, mainstream medical researchers accept a great deal of mythology uncritically, such as the existence of the placebo effect. I am no expert by any means, but based on the papers I have read on that subject, I do not think it exists. I am surprised so many doctors believe in it. "Evidence-based" and "outcome-based" medical research is still a novelty, and they do not seem good at it. - Jed
