Did the DOE visit the students results? I suggest not. Did they sit in
front of a SEM and see the transmutated products? I suggest they did not
and never left their office. Sorry but real word results trumps DOE
theory anytime. As far as replicating P&F, did you actually read the
test results the students did? I think the DOE would be severely
embarrassed by 1 prof, 1 grad student and 2 high school students blowing
up their negative FPE spin job. We will replicate the students results.
It should be very low cost and simple to do. Something that any lab
could do and for less than pocket change. If the students results in
2002 and 2003 did not convince the DOE, then then the DOE needs to be
torn apart as it is non functional.
On 12/19/2011 11:56 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I state again. 1 professor, 1 grad and 2 high school students
replicated F&P in a MIT lab in front of over 100 ICCF 10
participants in 2002 and 2003. The observed excess heat and
transmutations.
It wasn't enough to convince the DOE in 2004. And why would they
suppress it if they actually believed it? The prospect of other
countries -- unfriendly countries -- getting the technology first
would surely scare them shitless.
The FPE is real and can be easily replicated.
That's not what the researchers say. They always talk about how
erratic the results are, how quantitative results are elusive. And if
tens (or hundreds or thousands) of watts are being produced by nuclear
reactions, why can no one set up an isolated device with no input
energy and persistent output energy? You know, like an RTG.
