On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:21 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < [email protected]> wrote:
> It's all in the eye of the beholder. The point I think you gloss over is > the apparent fact that Rossi is not deliberately (or overtly) "...acting in > a way that suggests investor fraud." Rossi is instead employing > passive-tactics indirectly... through his inaction he conveniently allows > individuals like you who are predisposed to assume the worst in others to > make such assumptions all by yourself. In other words, you are actually > helping Rossi's business strategy by your continued actions of casting > dispersions of doubt and fraud on Rossi's part. It helps give Rossi a > competitive edge against all forms of potential competitors who may read > and buy into your incessant insinuations. > I doubt very much that what I write on the internet influences anyone who has made a serious study of Rossi. But if it gives Rossi help, why in the world do you object? You seem very conflicted about it. I am not "predisposed to assume the worst in others". In fact, I initially approached Rossi's story back in January 2011, with great and eager anticipation. When he was criticized prematurely, I urged people to wait and see what he would do next. Well... I saw what he did next. He acted exactly like that prototypic fraudulent outfit Steorn and their duplicitous and disingenuous CEO Sean McCarthy. Bad demonstrations and anonymous customers shouldn't impress much. > **** > > Keep in mind, in matters of warfare employing deception and > disinformation are crucial tactics used in winning wars. Why would you > think that running a competitive businesses would be any different? Since I > gather you are a skeptic, I would suggest that understanding this alone > might be another reason why you might want to consider toning down your > campaign against Rossi, because for the moment you are probably helping > Rossi’s business strategy more than you might realize. > Suppositions about Rossi's business strategy are simply hilarious and little else. You do not appear to know much history, such as in matters of self-serving > business deception tactics. Here’s additional nefarious information on > Toyota’s “Deception and evasion” tactics: > I looked at the link you provided and it is completely unrelated and irrelevant. It relates to Toyota's *legal* defense against law suits. Of course lawyers use dishonest tactics and hide information. Is that a surprise to you? Wow. > **** > > Quite frankly, Mary, you continue to make incredibly ignorant remarks. > A compliment, coming from you. Thanks. > It’s back to the kill file with you. > Fine. Be an ostrich.
