On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You do not know what you are talking about. > Well, that's a good argument. > So you ARE going to buy a 1 MW reactor?!? I am astounded. > I am not buying a leaky claptrap collection of 100 or so badly assembled, messy looking kludges hooked to a half megawatt generator and said without proof to make the same power the generator puts out. I mean couldn't Rossi have tried to be a little convincing by using say a 250 kW device into one almost a half a megawatt in capability? Even for just the sake of appearances, LOL. > 1. The reactors are not leaky. > Oh. Was it raining October 28? Seemed there was a lot of water not in pipes. > 2. It is not half-rated, although it wasn't working at full power on Oct. > 28. It is a miracle that it worked at all. > Sorry, there was no miracle. Well... if you don't count how many people that bizarre dog and pony show apparently convinced. > 3. It does not require a diesel generator. That's a silly thing to > say. Mains electricity works fine. They did not have large enough ones > available in that factory. > Pity. They could have run the thing from the mains a lot cheaper. > 4. The customer chooses to be anonymous. It does not "have to." > Yes. You still believe there was a customer, LOL. Stop making up nonsense. Rossi has many weaknesses, as does any start-up > with a prototype. You do not need to make up unfounded nonsense to make him > look worse than he is. > I don't think it's possible to make him look worse than he does himself.
