On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote:
> Of course we welcome your contributions to the technical discussion here. Perhaps you could take a moment to explain how citing sources which can't be named, which supposedly make claims in support of Rossi, and which you claim told you they did independent tests but can't reveal materials, methods and results -- maybe you can explain how that constitutes a part of a "technical discussion". If it isn't, why are you doing it?
