On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> I don't believe Rossi, but I do believe that Eff Vivakeef is acting beyond
> the pale for Vortex. "Convicted fraudster" is libel.
>

I don't think that's libel.  It may not be the whole story but you can find
in several reports from mainline newspapers that Rossi was indeed convicted
of fraud and sentenced to 8 years in jail.  Like so many things Rossi, I
can't find any discussion of any credible nature about how long he actually
served in jail if any and where and when.  Maybe someone can find that.
Rossi was also charged with money laundering and gold smuggling in addition
to the Petroldragon Affair.  There was a long list of charges, some leading
to convictions, some of which were repealed on appeal or on technicalities
IIRC but Mr. Rossi was indeed convicted of at least one felony for fraud at
least one time-- probably more.


> I'm not seeing any victims of Rossi show up. Know of any?
>

Somebody had to clean up hundreds or thousands of tons of what amounted to
sewage and environmental toxins due to Rossi.  It was described in the
press as a major environmental catastrophe -- all due to Rossi.   The DOD
lost a lot of money in the TE debacle due to Rossi.  None of those folks
are likely to complain here.  As to victims of his current caper if it's
fraud?  That will take a lot of time.  Steorn's victims are obvious (the
investors) but have not filed complaints anyone knows of to this day, about
6 years after the start.  Maybe they signed clever and misleading
disclaimers and decided the court battle is not worth the trouble.  They
were clearly defrauded though -- by public record, Steorn spent 21 million
Euros in about four years.  By the same records, they have made nothing
which has ever been independently found to work or sold for profit to
anyone anywhere ever.  There were a few independent tests by fan-people and
they were uniformly non supportive of the slightest claim to the so-called
"technology".


> Facts welcome. Libelous polemic, not.
>

Calling Rossi a convicted felon is not libelous-- it seems to be fact.

Reply via email to