On 23/01/2012 6:31 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:


On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Mary, there are serious problems with Rossi's demonstrations that we
    are all aware of.  It is apparent to me that he has a very difficult
    problem trying to maintain stability of the power output and I have
    been doing some interesting simulation that tends to support this
    claim.  The October 6 test data shows a clear fingerprint of LENR
    heat production which I hope to explain soon.  All of the other
    models that I have seen thus far do not respond in a manner that
    comes even close to explaining the anomaly.  These models have been
    based upon energy storage and release from a large mass of material
    inside the smaller cube.  A better explanation for the curve can be
    obtained by assuming that a large peak of excess thermal energy is
    released at the end of the drive cycle due to an inherently unstable
    thermal run away process that is quenched just before it becomes
    unstoppable.



If so, shouldn't Rossi be telling us that?  Do you think he told his
anonymous customer who supposedly bought **13** "power plants"
consisting of some 600+ individual modular units?  Do you believe there
is such a customer?  Is someone really that dense?   What would 13 such
things possibly be used for?

As is becoming clearer every day, Rossi is a PROVEN serial liar and fraudster. He has no respect for truth in business nor for the truth of his Ecat claims.

I have shown how he arranged to created a higher than reality Tout measurement for the 6 Oct test. This was not a mistake. It was intentional fraud by a man who has no respect for the truth nor for the reputations of those around him.

Shaun

Reply via email to