The strong statement Motl uses as his basis is that LENR is "proven theoretically impossible" and it is a much repeated falsehood.
The recently developed Hagelstein Hamiltonian theorems for gaseous molecules inside a lattice demonstrate that this area of research is in it's infancy, so where else can there be this comprehensive theory that can prove LENR's are "theoretically impossible"? It is a conceited statement based on plain old ignorance of the limits of current theoretical physical frameworks. ________________________________ From: Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:21 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Lubos motll, physicis talk of CERN CF conference, and bash it... Peter is right. Ignore him is the best thing, although it is hard. He was banned(sort of) from Harvard due his strong opinions on women and black people. He's been unemployed for around 5 years because of that. 2012/2/13 Peter Gluck <[email protected]> Sorry, dear Alain, he is too arrogant and omniscient and I have commented accordingly. >If you ignore the facts as he does, you can be always right as the Duce was. >Peter > > > >On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > >http://motls.blogspot.com/2012/02/cold-fusion-colloquium-at-cern.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29&utm_content=Google+Reader >> >>Motl is very rough agains CF, and seems not aware of SPAWAR, and other >>replication. >> >>please, don't be aggressive, he have strong ego, strong competence, but few >>moderation in his opinion... >> > > > >-- >Dr. Peter Gluck >Cluj, Romania >http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
