I don't feel that "“respected” skeptics are retiring from the field in the face of the growing evidence"... you should read Judith Curry... in fact it seems that, fair or not, the history is tumbling... first rats start to flee the drowning boat...
anyway, about LM, I've always been shocked by his lack of moderation in any opinion, his rough "US Republican Coffee party" vision of economy, and nearly faint on some things not to say (sorry here it is a crime, and a proven stupidity; also a family insult in every large family)... anyway, his opinion and vulgarization on QM is great and cutting edge. an example why one should avoid "ad hominem" critics. 2012/2/13 Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> > His career will suffer for poor timing, while other “respected” skeptics > are retiring from the field in the face of the growing evidence, they are > letting the young blood charge forward to take their place under the > oncoming bus. Although there was once good reason to be skeptical those > reasons continue to erode and that rate has been increasing rapidly of > late. The longer Lubos keeps his head buried the more he shortens his own > career. **** > > ** ** > > Was Daniel suggesting Lubos has made both sexist and racist remarks? > [snip] He was banned(sort of) from Harvard due his strong opinions on > women and black people. He's been unemployed for around 5 years because of > that.[/snip]. I would hate to think we are giving any consideration to this > man if so.**** > > ** ** > > Fran**** >
