Until today I had never heard of Lubos Motl, however, having followed LENR/Cold 
Fusion since last January his attitude doesn't surprise me.  Pardon the 
generalization but it just seems that Physicists have the notion they are 
experts on everything.  Until this last year I had thought that arrogance was 
reserved for Lawyers.  The difference though is that while lawyers think they 
can be experts on all things Human, including physics, generally they do 
recognize how little they actually know about anything (In other words Human's 
are still savages in the universe and we most likely know nothing if measured 
by all knowledge).  Lobus's silly comments clearly indicate he hasn't learned 
that lesson.

And again I speak only in generalizations and I don't mean to offend either 
Physicists or lawyers who have learned some humility.

Ransom
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Alain Sepeda 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:28 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Lubos motll, physicis talk of CERN CF conference, and bash 
it...


  I don't feel that "“respected” skeptics are retiring from the field in the 
face of the growing evidence"... you should read Judith Curry... in fact it 
seems that, fair or not, the history is tumbling... first rats start to flee 
the drowning boat...

  anyway, about LM, I've always been shocked by his lack of moderation in any 
opinion, his rough "US Republican Coffee party" vision of economy, and nearly 
faint on some things not to say (sorry here it is  a crime, and a proven 
stupidity; also a family insult in every large family)...

  anyway, his opinion and vulgarization on QM is great and cutting edge.

  an example why one should avoid "ad hominem" critics.




  2012/2/13 Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]>

    His career will suffer for poor timing, while other “respected” skeptics 
are retiring from the field in the face of the growing evidence, they are 
letting the young blood charge forward to take their place under the oncoming 
bus.  Although there was once good reason to be skeptical those reasons 
continue to erode and that rate has been increasing rapidly of late. The longer 
 Lubos keeps his head buried the more he shortens his own career.  



    Was Daniel suggesting Lubos has made both sexist and racist remarks? [snip] 
He was banned(sort of) from Harvard due his strong opinions  on women and  
black people. He's been unemployed for around 5 years because of that.[/snip]. 
I would hate to think we are giving any consideration to this man if so.



    Fran


Reply via email to