sad, because I imagine that with good mood and good will, he could be precious in his competence domain.
No so surprised a quantum geek like him, is a bit strange. anyway more stable than john Nash. 2012/2/13 GJB <[email protected]> > The strong statement Motl uses as his basis is that LENR is "proven > theoretically impossible" and it is a much repeated falsehood. > > The recently developed Hagelstein Hamiltonian theorems for gaseous > molecules inside a lattice demonstrate that this area of research is in > it's infancy, so where else can there be this comprehensive theory that can > prove LENR's are "theoretically impossible"? > > It is a conceited statement based on plain old ignorance of the limits of > current theoretical physical frameworks. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 February 2012 12:21 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Lubos motll, physicis talk of CERN CF conference, and > bash it... > > Peter is right. Ignore him is the best thing, although it is hard. He was > banned(sort of) from Harvard due his strong opinions on women and black > people. He's been unemployed for around 5 years because of that. > > 2012/2/13 Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > > Sorry, dear Alain, he is too arrogant and omniscient and I have commented > accordingly. > If you ignore the facts as he does, you can be always right as the Duce > was. > Peter > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > > > http://motls.blogspot.com/2012/02/cold-fusion-colloquium-at-cern.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LuboMotlsReferenceFrame+%28Lubos+Motl%27s+reference+frame%29&utm_content=Google+Reader > > Motl is very rough agains CF, and seems not aware of SPAWAR, and other > replication. > > please, don't be aggressive, he have strong ego, strong competence, but > few moderation in his opinion... > > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > > > >
