In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:46:06 +0800: Hi, [snip] >Robin, let me see if I got this right.
Sorry, no. > >1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and >convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in >copious amounts with an output of energy. Yes. > >2. Then, you take the Hy2 molecule and split it into Hy+ and Hy+ molecule. No. There are two paths. One involves a simple split of the molecule into two Hydrinos, the other involves the creation of a Hydrino and a Hydrino molecular ion. >This involves an input of 4000eV. Approximately yes. However the actual amount varies with Hydrino size. > >3. Then you fuse Hy+ with Hy+ to form a hydrino variant of Helium. No. I would prefer to fuse a Hydrino with B+++++ to create 3 alpha particles. However since there is a small amount of D in natural Hydrogen, the p+D=>He3 reaction is also going to happen, which will (at least initially) produce gamma rays. > >4. Then this hydrino variant of He becomes normal Helium with an input of >energy. > > >Did I get this right? No. > >And all this results in a COP of 1000 - 2000? At best yes. What one might actually get in practice remains to be seen. > >I think the first step is to prove the existence of the Hydrino to begin >with. Do we have any conclusive proof that hydrinos exists? As Mike Carrell says: Check out the BLP website. However your suggested approach is just the conventional cautious approach to doing everything. In small increments. That approach is unnecessary in this case because the investment required for going the "whole hog" is so small. It's kind of like building the very first refrigerator. You just do it and see if it works. (BTW the analogy is not bad. The complexity is about on a par.) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
