Hi Jojo, I'd hate to say I read it on Wikipedia, but there's also more scientific sources than that. I'm not about to go do the research for you, I suggest you check it out yourself. Abiogenesis is a problem and scientists are working on it. That's a lot of why we looking for life on other planets, other solar systems and in extreme environments on earth. Amino acids have been found in comet tails, they're really not that complicated.
Colin On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > You don't know that. But even if it was, that still does not solve your > abiogenesis problem. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Colin Hercus <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 07, 2012 1:40 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The Fallacis of Darwinian Evolution - Genetic > Improbability > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Jojo Jaro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Abd, I appreciate your comments. >> >> After reading your post below and rereading it and rereading it several >> times, I am still at a lost on what you are contending. Please restate >> your contentions in simpler prose that dumb people like me can understand. >> >> Yes, While we know that amino acids can be created from non-life simple >> hydrocarbons, the conditions do not match known earth atmospheric >> conditions. I believe you are alluding to the Urey-Miller experiment where >> they successfully created amino acids from base molecular H20 and some >> simple hydrocarbons. But one thing you need to realize, it never created >> any self-replicating molecules, it never create any "life" >> >> The Urey-Miller experiment was successful but did not simulate the >> correct conditions. For one, it was performed on a "Reducing" Atmosphere >> of hydrocarbon gases, not the oxidative atmosphere with oxygen. When the >> experiment was redone with oxygen, the oxidizing action of oxygen destroyed >> the animo acids just as quickly as it was created. Hence, the experiment >> was designed on top of faulty assumptions. >> > No, the earths atmosphere was reducing before we had photo synthesis > >
