I wrote:
> I give this more credence than anything from Rossi, DGT, Brillouin or >> Piantelli, for instance. >> > > Me too. > That's not to say that DGT and Piantelli lack any credence. Rossi is on a planet by himself. Impossible to judge. I have no technical reason to doubt him but by every other metric I have no reason to believe him. If Celani, Brillouin and others had not reported high power density Ni-H reactions I would not believe Rossi. He inspired these others, yet in the course of inspiring these others, he did *nothing* to improve his own credibility. Nothing! When he might easily convince the world his claims are true. This is why Mike McKubre and I are convinced that Rossi does not want credibility, for the same reason Patterson did not want it. That seems to be the only explanation. - Jed
