*Suppose the NAE is a resonance of some kind....* * * *A very high Q "perfect" resonant structure of exactly the right size will start or run with just minor thermal excitation...* * * *and be maintained by the coupling from the effect it creates.*
Look into the Fano resonance of electrons in narrow Nano-metric cavities. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Paul Breed <p...@rasdoc.com> wrote: > I'm not saying that external energy is required, only that setting that as > a unconditional unquestioned principal upon which one is going to > accept or reject theories seems weak, especially because we know that in > some cases the addition of energy accelerates the process. > > If one accepts Defklions or Ross'is claims at all they seem to be able to > turn it on and off at will... > Same with Brilliuons phase one published experiments... > > Suppose the NAE is a resonance of some kind.... > A very high Q "perfect" resonant structure of exactly the right size will > start or run with just minor thermal excitation... > and be maintained by the coupling from the effect it creates. > > A less perfect slightly lower Q structure might run with a tiny tickle of > the right excitation.... > > An even less perfect much lower Q structure might allow transmutations, > but not energy gain when properly stimulated.... > > Experiments like the arc transmutations and the hydrogen xray > tube neutron generator experiments seem to do LENR without > having to specially prepare or otherwise coddle the material..... > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> Do you think that a random comic ray would start a process at one single >> site in a material that causes steady release of watts of power? Cosmic >> rays do not even initiate chemical reactions. For example TNT is completely >> stable in spite of being bombarded continuously. Of course, imagination >> can suggest all kinds of process, but a little common sense has to be used. >> Otherwise, no progress will be made,. >> >> Ed >> >> On Feb 22, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Paul Breed wrote: >> >> I would question assumption #5 >> 5. The process does not require applied energy to be initiated >> >> With start up times measured in days...I don't think you can say that, ie >> a random cosmic ray, >> or stray energy from anywhere..... could kick it off.... >> >> I would also question the complete rejection of the neutron creation >> branch of theory.... >> I found the following to be somewhat interesting in this realm... >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-ca-1950ssternglass-exptseinstein-bethenov-25-2011 >> >> >> >
