*Radiation is the ONLY way an active material can be quickly identified. This tool has been ignored. I'm trying to get you and other people to use it *
I suggest that you might look for an increase of thermoelectric current produced by the reaction. Rossi has said he has seen this increase in his high temperature LENR system. Cheers: Axil On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Paul Breed <p...@rasdoc.com> wrote: > >Radiation is the ONLY way an active material can be quickly identified. > This tool has been ignored. I'm trying to get you and other people to use > it > > Understood, the system I'm building will have at least one GM tube of > equal or better sensitivity to the LND7313 you used in your experiment.... > in fact that instrument arrived yesterday. > > Setting up a quick IR temp measurement from inside a > hot pressurized vessel is neither cheap nor easy... > I'm trying to determine if the radiation only is sufficient or if I should > stick to my original plan to put in IR temp sensing of the material under > test. > Its looking like a robust reliable IR sensing of small targets inside the > chamber will be about $5K and 4+ weeks of lead time. > > The lower cost IR stuff won't go to high enough temperatures to be > useful... > (As others have pointed out one needs to be above the curie temperature of > the material being tested.) > > Paul > > >
