James Bowery wrote:
At this point I'm not really interested in confirmation. I have all the confirmation I need to summarily reject the "sheer coincidence" explanation with just the two events.
It seems to me you have to have a plausible mechanism to confirm that something is not a coincidence. You have to show how these two rocks affected one-another, or came from the same place. Statistics alone cannot prove a connection. Certainly not in this case, since there are many undiscovered rocks in space.
- Jed
