Again you make some interesting assertions that do not seem
to be valid. Recall that in ICCF 10
Letts and I gave back to back presentations and papers that included a remote
demonstration (since the conference precluded live demos) involving laser
stimulation. (see
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue52/ifcc10review.html or your
file http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LettsDlaserstimua.pdf)
We did a remote demo that included papers involving remotely
turning on the laser in Boston and the audience could follow the XP live via
labview and PC anywhere during
the talk. Granted it was only about a
watt in Boston and ¼ W in Monte Carlo, but still demos and papers were give at
both.
I don’t think your assumptions about demos, papers, and presentations
are correct. My hypothesis is that the higher
energy levels and “sizzle” is what is required.
It is like all of Obama’s administration funding of the fraudulent “green
energy companies”. Sizzle, hype and
political favors sale even impractical systems- not papers, presentations and
demos. I also point to Rossi as how hype seems to trump reality or papers. You
may wish to re evaluate your hypothesis.
D2Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:25:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: only a perfect LENR theory should attack other
theories
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
I mean to say that Dennis did NOT set the stage properly, or follow up properly.
Dennis or whoever it was who arranged that demo at Monte Carlo. No idea who.
It was a big fat wasted opportunity. Why go to all that trouble if you are not
going to publish a permanent record of the event? A handful of people get a
chance to see the demo during a conference. Since that conference, people have
visited my web site MILLIONS OF TIMES. Around 2.5 million times. Think about
that. You spend weeks and tens of thousands of dollars to impress a few dozen
people, and then you ignore an audience of 2.5 million people.
I simply cannot understand the mindset of people who do that. Yet there are
hundreds of researchers who do. I guess most are old, and they do not
understand the power and reach of the Internet.
- Jed
