I don’t think that any of my work is secret and I have
helped many others in the field. Perhaps
I have not worked 24/7 at it but I think I have turned out a lot for someone
working from the sidelines. Again, if
you feel that more work should be done- then do it or supervise someone who
will. I am sure there are many graduate
students you could direct and help. If
you don’t find any then you are not looking hard enough for someone that thinks
as you do about the fate of the world is in your hands.
Have not come to the podium??? I thought I was the opening keynote talk at
ICCF-14 and gave a talk on practical methods of seeing the effect at
ICCF10 and a few others. I cannot travel easily out of the country to others
due to security clearances. You seem to have a selective memory.
ICCF-17….. I asked Duncan several times last year about
presenting a revealing demo and got no reply.
They seem more interested in business support like NI. It is too late now to
field anything and I
have re-focused my efforts. I have
turned to open sourcing my work on the net.
You may not like my application but it is open sourcing – part by part,
event by slow event. Right now it is mostly mechanical but the chemistry is
coming soon. Perhaps it will
take a few years this way, but I have already had about 250 people emailing
and are interested. I am even getting others to machine parts and try
experiments. Not too bad for <1 month
work. I don't expect the funding to be at hign levels, but it has turned up a
lot of interest and support- from all over the globe. (a lot from Italy and
Russia for some reason??)
You offer an interesting hypothesis as to how cold
fusion/LENR could be accepted. However,
can you point to any example in 24 years where your hypothesis has led to your
assumed acceptance? I think you will
find all the things you have proposed have been done multiple times and have
never lead to any general acceptance. I
think that the history of CF is on my side. Many “experiments” concerning your
hypothesis have
been done as to publishing, giving talks, conducting lab visits,….. But it has
changed nothing.
My hypothesis is that if you want different outcomes, you
must do something different. I am in the process of testing that hypothesis.
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:05:59 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: CMNS: only a perfect LENR theory should attack other
theories
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
I wrote: I have given the cold fusion researchers an audience of 10,000 readers
a week, at LENR-CANR.org. I did this at great expense and effort. This audience
includes people at many leading universities and corporations . . .
People here may have wondered why I make such a big deal about this. About the
fact that Cravens and others do not publish papers or make any other effort to
reach an audience. Look at it this way --
Imagine that I go to great effort and expense to rent a large auditorium. I
pass out flyers, pay Google to advertise, and I gather an audience of 10,000
experts in the seats. (Okay, 5,000 experts, and several thousand odd people.)
The audience awaits, hushed and polite, receptive, even anxious to hear about
cold fusion.
I ask Dennis Cravens to come to podium and present his results. He says, No, I
don't want to work with others, I am not interested in money, the Navy screwed
me last time, and blah, blah and blah de blah blah. Not just Dennis but many
others give me this kind of bull. Not just at LENR-CANR.org but in the ICCF
conference, which I doing my best to help organize.
Rob Duncan, Biberian, me, and many others are doing the best we can to give the
researchers an opportunity to present their results and get serious attention,
and possibly funding. Instead of thanking us, we get a barrage of abuse,
jealousy, excuses and nonsense from some researchers. As I said, Ed has a right
to be cranky. So do I, by golly!
I will grant that Cravens did not ask me to do this. He has never asked me to
do anything. So I do not blame him for ignoring my efforts and the ICCF. Who
know; maybe he has inside connections more potent than the audience at
LENR-CANR. But if he does not, then I do blame him for is kvetching and moaning
that people ignore him and he does not have the resources he needs, when he
will not even write a paper or make the effort to meet the audience half-way.
- Jed
