In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:38:42 -0400: Hi, You were arguing that neutron repulsion (which correlates with neutron density) was a hindrance to it being a possible cause of CF. I simply provided a well known and obvious example to the contrary. If you want a less "emotional" example, then consider a fission reactor.
>This is a false comparison, an emotional one, and one that damages LENR. If >the common man compares LENR to nuclear fission or fusion, progress on the >PR front for LENR will go backward. > >A bomb uses more than 8 kilograms of material in a pit where the reaction >occurs throughout the entire bulk of the material. > >Most believe that LENR uses only the thin surface skin of 10 Grams of >micropowder only a few nanometers thick. > >This is because electrons do not penetrate the surface of the Lattice >because they travel in a strong alternating current. > >The volume of this surface materiel is minuscule. > >The percentage of the volume devoted to the NAE is some minuscule fraction >of this surface volume. > >Your comparison with a bomb is way off in terms of magnitude. > > >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:37:04 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >All the above does not apply to neutrons. Neutrons cannot be packed by the >> >zillions into a tiny space. >> >> Enough can be packed into a tiny space in a fission bomb to release a >> Megaton of >> energy in a fraction of a second. CF requires but a minuscule fraction of >> this >> power density. >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
