Why would you need tons to make a critical mass in a reactor?  I suspect that 
it would be possible to use the approximately the same amount as required in 
the nuclear core if you wished to reduce it to the minimum.


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, Mar 28, 2013 4:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Low Energy Neutrons and Local Temperature


In a fission reactor, you need tons of Pu239 and/or U235 to make the reactor 
critical.
Again in this case, all the bulk of the fiscal material is involved in the 
nuclear reaction; tons of it.
This latest example is going in the wrong direction to support your case, from 
pounds of material to tons needed to go critical.
 
 
Cheers:   axil


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:51 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:

In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:38:42 -0400:
Hi,

You were arguing that neutron repulsion (which correlates with neutron density)
was a hindrance to it being a possible cause of CF. I simply provided a well
known and obvious example to the contrary.
If you want a less "emotional" example, then consider a fission reactor.



>This is a false comparison, an emotional one, and one that damages LENR. If
>the common man compares LENR to nuclear fission or fusion, progress on the
>PR front for LENR will go backward.
>
>A bomb uses more than 8 kilograms of material in a “pit” where the reaction
>occurs throughout the entire bulk of the material.
>
>Most believe that LENR uses only the thin surface skin of 10 Grams of
>micropowder only a few nanometers thick.
>
>This is because electrons do not penetrate the surface of the Lattice
>because they travel in a strong alternating current.
>
>The volume of this surface materiel is minuscule.
>
>The percentage of the volume devoted to the NAE is some minuscule fraction
>of this surface volume.
>
>Your comparison with a bomb is way off in terms of magnitude.
>
>
>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In reply to  Axil Axil's message of Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:37:04 -0400:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>> >All the above does not apply to neutrons. Neutrons cannot be packed by the
>> >zillions into a tiny space.
>>
>> Enough can be packed into a tiny space in a fission bomb to release a
>> Megaton of
>> energy in a fraction of a second. CF requires but a minuscule fraction of
>> this
>> power density.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk
>>
>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
>>
>>
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html





 

Reply via email to