I replied to Gibson in private with various details, but wrote this part for the group:
For me more interesting is to work out what is required to make this interact with matter. Consider that dark matter and mirror matter and dark energy is considered to exist by conventional science and all effectively undetectable. Neutrinos and virtual particles are only vaguely detectable by very specialized equipment (nothing I have access to obviously) This means that there can be a lot of very real stuff that just doesn't exist in the right form to interact with matter. Charge is quantanized, so what if a particle could be made with a charge that was not 1, what if such a particle can and does exist, but we can't interact with it? So there might be many ways to make something that can't be detected readily by most most instrumentation. But there will also be ways to ensure that the energy converges on the physical, and as such it may produce a host of anomalies, or useful effects. I am sharing this with Vo in order to get some suggestions on how to turn this into a hard science. John On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Gibson Elliot <gibsonell...@yahoo.com>wrote: > John > > You may want to start collecting information from those that do respond to > you. Blue sky, but If you could get Genetic information you might be able > to identify certain correlations between images/structures and the people > who feel them. Or focus on those with strong reactions. I suspect that you > have developed quite a few images, could you send me all you have > available? No indications of active or inactive, just numbered. I'll set > things up at my lab to do a blind study. If you could give pantone numbers > for the colors you use, I could have them printed by a local printer to > exact specification, and checked "blind" across as many people as I can > expose to them. > > Do you have any data regarding how far away a person can feel effects of > various images? Any that can be felt further away? My thinking here is that > piling them one on top of the other might affect each other. Aether > does permeate everything and so shielding or isolating them could be an > issue. Hence the questions about distance. I may have to bring cards into > range one at a time. > > Gibson > ------------------------------ > *From:* John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:09 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here? > > Subtle changes in the image and it would be very different. > > Ok, here, I made 2 images, I wanted them to look almost identical, one is > active and one isn't, I just went ahead and labeled them, so if you wanted > a blind test no luck. > > http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/9209/activeandinactive.png > > I was limited as to what I could do to keep the images similar in form, > but make one strong and the other off. > > If the effects was simply due to seeing some vague representation of an > Ahnk then both images have that. > > Now this is not the best image to start with, and not the best if your > ability to feel any effect is marginal, but worth a shot. > > The image is very sensitive to any manipulation of colours, so if your > monitor or videocard is set to vivid, or has a gamma correction, brightness > or contrast or other manipulation so the exact colour values aren't > delivered, this entire image could be quite relatively inactive. > > I will work on an image suitable for scale testing, face up and face down > might be imperfect especially because once energized it can retain some > activity despite reduced lighting. but a boost is observed from turning a > light on. > > John > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > These are very unusual images. They do elicit emotion. **** > ** ** > Some of that could be based on similarities to known symbolism as opposed > to an aether effect, but then again, that symbolism itself may derive from > some kind of primitive understanding of the way that optical images > interact with brain neutrons. The “shooter” is reminiscent of Navaho art > and the latest/strongest to Egyptian imagery.**** > ** ** > I shrunk the second one down to get 9 on a page, then printed cut and > stacked the images to see if there was anything which showed up on a gram > scale (comparing face up to face down). There was nothing objective, but I > am using a laser printer so the color did not contribute.**** > ** ** > Jones**** > ** ** > *From:* John Berry **** > ** ** > Has no one tried it yet?**** > ** ** > ** ** > And a 3rd image to try to feel, this contains recent development with > some previous ones.**** > http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/6251/rotational.png**** > ** ** > All in an effort to reduce the odds of having people report they don't > feel anything.**** > ** ** > Again, best in a dark room (but not required).**** > ** ** > Feel for any sensations.**** > ** ** > http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1139/lateststrongest4.png**** > ** ** > http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/6029/shooterv54.png**** > ** ** > ** ** > ** ** > > > > >
