Andrea Rossi
January 2nd, 2013 at 9:01
AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522231>

Dear Steven Karels:
Yes, that is exactly the path we are walking through. Too soon to give
precise info, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
 Steven Karels
January 2nd, 2013 at 8:22
AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522155>

Dear Andrea Rossi,

Your previous postings mentioned “direct EMF” coming from the reactor core.
Could you please clarify? I have heard of possible direct conversion to
electricity by coupling the energy from a charged moving particle into a
“transformer”. In general, is this the approach by which you are able to
extract “direct EMF”?


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>                 From: Axil Axil
>                 This is another reason why I believe that Rossi is telling
> the truth about his reactor. He says that his reactor produces huge amounts
> of electric current. So much current in fact that he can tap this current
> directly rather than use heat to steam conversion to produce electric
> power.
>
> What? Where does Rossi say "huge amounts of electric current" ?
>
> In fact he says that the emf detected required very precise measurement
> instrumentation. This implies microamps, not hundreds of amps.
>
> As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay
> garbage is nothing but complete BS.
>
>                 Rossi claimed, on Dec 30 to one his sycophants -
> Dear Bernie Koppenhofer:
> You are touching a very important point: during these very days, and also
> during the more recent tests, we are working on this issue. I think we will
> be able to produce directly e.m.f., but much work has to be done. Actually,
> we already produced direct e.m.f. with the reactors at high temperature,
> and
> we measured it with the very precise measurement instrumentation introduced
> by the third party expert, but we are not ready for an industrial
> production, while we are at a high level of industrialization for the
> production of heat and, at this point, also of high temperature steam,
> which
> is the gate to the Carnot Cycle. Thank you for your good comment.
>
> Warm Regards,
> A.R.
>
>
>

Reply via email to