More on direct emf http://ecatreport.com/andrearossi/on-rossis-fascinating-emf-discovery
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-electromagnetic-force-produced-directly-from-the-hot-cat/ > > Rossi: Electromotive Force Produced Directly from the Hot Cat [UPDATED] > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Andrea Rossi >> January 2nd, 2013 at 9:01 >> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522231> >> >> Dear Steven Karels: >> Yes, that is exactly the path we are walking through. Too soon to give >> precise info, though. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> Steven Karels >> January 2nd, 2013 at 8:22 >> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522155> >> >> Dear Andrea Rossi, >> >> Your previous postings mentioned “direct EMF” coming from the reactor >> core. Could you please clarify? I have heard of possible direct conversion >> to electricity by coupling the energy from a charged moving particle into a >> “transformer”. In general, is this the approach by which you are able to >> extract “direct EMF”? >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> From: Axil Axil >>> This is another reason why I believe that Rossi is >>> telling >>> the truth about his reactor. He says that his reactor produces huge >>> amounts >>> of electric current. So much current in fact that he can tap this current >>> directly rather than use heat to steam conversion to produce electric >>> power. >>> >>> What? Where does Rossi say "huge amounts of electric current" ? >>> >>> In fact he says that the emf detected required very precise measurement >>> instrumentation. This implies microamps, not hundreds of amps. >>> >>> As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay >>> garbage is nothing but complete BS. >>> >>> Rossi claimed, on Dec 30 to one his sycophants - >>> Dear Bernie Koppenhofer: >>> You are touching a very important point: during these very days, and also >>> during the more recent tests, we are working on this issue. I think we >>> will >>> be able to produce directly e.m.f., but much work has to be done. >>> Actually, >>> we already produced direct e.m.f. with the reactors at high temperature, >>> and >>> we measured it with the very precise measurement instrumentation >>> introduced >>> by the third party expert, but we are not ready for an industrial >>> production, while we are at a high level of industrialization for the >>> production of heat and, at this point, also of high temperature steam, >>> which >>> is the gate to the Carnot Cycle. Thank you for your good comment. >>> >>> Warm Regards, >>> A.R. >>> >>> >>> >> >
