Axil,

 

I am trying to state this as gently as possible without sounding like a
bully. You still did not address the question of "huge amounts of electric
current" which was a direct quote from you.

 

Since Rossi says that a precision instrument is required to see the emf, and
since any Radio Shack multimeter will show milliamps - we must assume he is
talking about microamps. There is no valid reason to go further than that.

 

Why do you insist on polluting serious attempts to understand LENR with this
crap about 10^20 neutrons? You seem to have no grasp of the implications of
that statement.

 

It only demonstrates that you have no prior understanding of nuclear
physics.

 

Jones

 

 

 

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:17 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Mexican hat

 

http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-electromagnetic-force-produced-direc
tly-from-the-hot-cat/

 

Rossi: Electromotive Force Produced Directly from the Hot Cat [UPDATED]

 

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

Andrea Rossi 

 <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522231>
January 2nd, 2013 at 9:01 AM 

Dear Steven Karels:
Yes, that is exactly the path we are walking through. Too soon to give
precise info, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

*  Steven Karels 

 <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522155>
January 2nd, 2013 at 8:22 AM 

Dear Andrea Rossi,

Your previous postings mentioned "direct EMF" coming from the reactor core.
Could you please clarify? I have heard of possible direct conversion to
electricity by coupling the energy from a charged moving particle into a
"transformer". In general, is this the approach by which you are able to
extract "direct EMF"?

 

Jones Beene wrote:


                From: Axil Axil

                This is another reason why I believe that Rossi is telling
the truth about his reactor. He says that his reactor produces huge amounts
of electric current. So much current in fact that he can tap this current
directly rather than use heat to steam conversion to produce electric power.

What? Where does Rossi say "huge amounts of electric current" ?

In fact he says that the emf detected required very precise measurement
instrumentation. This implies microamps, not hundreds of amps.

As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay
garbage is nothing but complete BS.

                Rossi claimed, on Dec 30 to one his sycophants -
Dear Bernie Koppenhofer:
You are touching a very important point: during these very days, and also
during the more recent tests, we are working on this issue. I think we will
be able to produce directly e.m.f., but much work has to be done. Actually,
we already produced direct e.m.f. with the reactors at high temperature, and
we measured it with the very precise measurement instrumentation introduced
by the third party expert, but we are not ready for an industrial
production, while we are at a high level of industrialization for the
production of heat and, at this point, also of high temperature steam, which
is the gate to the Carnot Cycle. Thank you for your good comment.

Warm Regards,
A.R.



 

 

Reply via email to