http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/01/rossi-electromagnetic-force-produced-directly-from-the-hot-cat/

Rossi: Electromotive Force Produced Directly from the Hot Cat [UPDATED]


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Andrea Rossi
> January 2nd, 2013 at 9:01 
> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522231>
>
> Dear Steven Karels:
> Yes, that is exactly the path we are walking through. Too soon to give
> precise info, though.
> Warm Regards,
> A.R.
>  Steven Karels
> January 2nd, 2013 at 8:22 
> AM<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-522155>
>
> Dear Andrea Rossi,
>
> Your previous postings mentioned “direct EMF” coming from the reactor
> core. Could you please clarify? I have heard of possible direct conversion
> to electricity by coupling the energy from a charged moving particle into a
> “transformer”. In general, is this the approach by which you are able to
> extract “direct EMF”?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>                 From: Axil Axil
>>                 This is another reason why I believe that Rossi is telling
>> the truth about his reactor. He says that his reactor produces huge
>> amounts
>> of electric current. So much current in fact that he can tap this current
>> directly rather than use heat to steam conversion to produce electric
>> power.
>>
>> What? Where does Rossi say "huge amounts of electric current" ?
>>
>> In fact he says that the emf detected required very precise measurement
>> instrumentation. This implies microamps, not hundreds of amps.
>>
>> As usual, Axil is off by orders of magnitude. His 10^20 neutron decay
>> garbage is nothing but complete BS.
>>
>>                 Rossi claimed, on Dec 30 to one his sycophants -
>> Dear Bernie Koppenhofer:
>> You are touching a very important point: during these very days, and also
>> during the more recent tests, we are working on this issue. I think we
>> will
>> be able to produce directly e.m.f., but much work has to be done.
>> Actually,
>> we already produced direct e.m.f. with the reactors at high temperature,
>> and
>> we measured it with the very precise measurement instrumentation
>> introduced
>> by the third party expert, but we are not ready for an industrial
>> production, while we are at a high level of industrialization for the
>> production of heat and, at this point, also of high temperature steam,
>> which
>> is the gate to the Carnot Cycle. Thank you for your good comment.
>>
>> Warm Regards,
>> A.R.
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to