Joseph, So sorry, please excuse me, the answer I requested is still pending.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/13138/1/thesis.pdf > > This experimenter found not much alpha decay help from high powered lasers > alone. > > Sorry, the screening comes from polariton production by laser stimuli of > nano-particles. > > Read about it here > > > http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CDYQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phy-astr.gsu.edu%2Fstockman%2Fdata%2FStockman_Phys_Today_2011_Physics_behind_Applications.pdf&ei=eF2DUf7KFcri4AOVq4CIDA&usg=AFQjCNHdcmFaRe9tfcLMzk1V8uwPQ8OvXA&sig2=J5nT-S9WrJdOT6_8uZyOVQ > > Chemists build their own custom sub-atomic particles that do what they > want. Protons, neutrons and electrons are so passé. > > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Joseph S. Barrera III <j...@barrera.org>wrote: > >> On 5/2/2013 11:06 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> *Accelerated alpha-decay of 232U isotope achieved by exposure of its >> aqueous solution with gold nanoparticles to laser radiation * >> >> >> I don't see any mention of "screening" in the text of that paper. Can you >> point me to a paragraph that discusses what you term "screening"? >> >> BTW, this paper is talking about huge energy flux required to induce >> nuclear transformations -- 10^18 W/cm^2 without nanoparticles + unstable >> elements, 10^12 or 10^13 W/cm^2 with. >> >> Even 10^12 W/cm^2 is massive. It's interesting to ponder whether this >> high level of energy in could produce enough radioactive decay produce a >> matching amount of energy out. But this process seems a lot closer to >> inertial containment than a desktop LENR engine. >> >> - Joe >> >> >
