On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wow. I had no idea. Now, why didn't they just do this bit of math for the > DOE panel instead of trying to convince them with boring old scientific > evidence. > > ***AFAIK, it was published after the (incredibly biased) DOE Panel. > Either that, or they knew, as any intelligent person would, that no one not already a true believer, would take such an analysis seriously. Anyway, it's published now. Why not send it on to the DOE? And it's true, the DOE is biased. They know that cold fusion, if it were real, would benefit the US government and her people strategically, economically, and environmentally, and so they are inclined to accept weaker evidence than they ordinarily would.
