On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> In Storms' book I think there are 180 positive excess heat studies. >>> Each one typically reflects several excess heat events. A few were based on >>> dozens of events. Fleischmann and Pons had the best success rate, running >>> 64 cells at a time several times. Every one of them worked. >>> >> >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Joshua Cude <joshua.c...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> Until they didn't. >> >> >> > > ***Then you acknowledge those 64 cells did work. Pursuing this finding is > not pathological science. > You like semantic games I see. Sure they worked, where by "work" I mean they appeared to give off excess heat, to a careless researcher.
