2013/5/14 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > thanks for the clear explanation.
Beyond that evident fact, that clearly established existence of one event is enough to prove it is possible, and that replication is only a human-factor redundence (against errors, frauds, incompetence, artifacts), there is a huge question ? how supposed serious scientist can use that stupid arguments ? they are not stupid enough, not incompetent enough, not to know that... they don't even have to understand it now, because they have been trained to that in logic courses, in lab courses, in physics courses, in epistemology courses, when younger... they see it working everyday in their job... Even engineers know that, and experience that in life.No need of a PhD. a MSc is enough. there is no possibility they can have sincerely such a reasoning. so what happened... It is clear that I answered the question . this is why whatever is said by such mainstream speaker have to be checked, like what say a politician, an attorney or a criminal suspect.
