Jed Rothwell stated: You have to look at the cathode before and after the test with microscopes and mass spectroscopy.
Axil replies: This examination of the results of LENR tells the experimenter little about the exact causation of LENR. The experiment must observe the LENR process as it is occurring. The experimenter should be able to adjust important LENR causation parameters to see how these parameters effect the LENR reaction. For example, how wide should the optimum crack be? How does crack with affect the power of the LENR reaction? How far away does the transmutation effect occur? When is radiation produced? What effect does increasing heat have on the LENR reaction? What temperature range is required to get LENR going? What are the transmutation products in real time? How does hydrogen pressure effect the LENR reaction? …and so on… The test for the Higgs field is currently limited to the six 9s existence test which is statistical in nature. What the details of the Higgs field are about is yet to be carried out. On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > > 2013/5/14 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > >> > thanks for the clear explanation. > > Beyond that evident fact, that clearly established existence of one event > is enough to prove it is possible, and that replication is only a > human-factor redundence (against errors, frauds, incompetence, artifacts), > there is a huge question ? > > how supposed serious scientist can use that stupid arguments ? > > they are not stupid enough, not incompetent enough, not to know that... > they don't even have to understand it now, because they have been trained > to that in logic courses, in lab courses, in physics courses, in > epistemology courses, when younger... > they see it working everyday in their job... > > Even engineers know that, and experience that in life.No need of a PhD. a > MSc is enough. > > there is no possibility they can have sincerely such a reasoning. > > so what happened... > It is clear that I answered the question . > > this is why whatever is said by such mainstream speaker have to be > checked, like what say a politician, an attorney or a criminal suspect. >
