On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:39 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eric, I agree with what Mark is saying. > You agree with him that 3-phase was not used in the March run when the paper says "a control circuit having three-phase power input and single-phase output". I never claimed 3-phase power went to the ecat. In fact I said the 3-phase input to the box was particularly unnecessary *because* only single-phase was used for the box. I think I got this right, and Mark's misleading accusation got 3 other true believers to get it wrong. And if you agree with him that I'm being deliberately misleading, you need a different example, because this one suggests that Mark is being deliberately misleading.
