Jed:
You left out the more important part of my posting: "And JC is WELL aware of this, yet asks the question as to why they used 3-phase power in their tests. the second test was SINGLE phase power, so *JC is misleading people*." He takes an issue from a single experiment, and by intentional implication, applies it to experiments where that issue does not apply. in order to cast doubt on a much wider range of empirical evidence that is warranted. Something that any rational, truly impartial scientist would not do. the fact that he does this over and over and over is proof that it is intentional. -Mark From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 12:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat test MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote: The first test used 3-phase power, the second DID NOT. Good point! The paper says: "The E-Cat HT2's power supply departs from that of the device used in December in that it is no longer three-phase, but single-phase: the TRIAC power supply has been replaced by a control circuit having three-phase power input and single-phase output, mounted within a box, the contents of which were not available for inspection, inasmuch as they are part of the industrial trade secret." Always go back to original sources. And remember that Ctrl-F (find) is your friend. - Jed
