You don't need new physics to explain cold fusion. Nor violate any
statistical physics. You just need to look for ignored solution in
the literature.


2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>

> No thanks.  Why don't you just answer the question?  It is pretty
> straightforward.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I wish Abd was here. Would you like to carry this conversation to his nVo?
>>
>>
>> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Then let's get back to your original statement:  "That's not good. It
>>> violates the 2nd law of thermo."   How is that not good?  That's like
>>> watching a rock hovering in the sky  saying, "that violates the law of
>>> gravity".  There's nothing good nor bad about it.  It's simply an
>>> experimental result.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't understand what you mean...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There are theories that avoid  the violation of the 2nd law.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ***Then as long as those theories can explain this experimental
>>>>> result, everything is in good shape.  Why would you say "That's not good"?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is an experimental finding, not a theory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/6/3 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Daniel Rocha 
>>>>>>> <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's not good. It violates the 2nd law of thermo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***It is an experimental finding.  Like Feynman says, experiment
>>>>>>> trumps theory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>>>>>> danieldi...@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>>>> danieldi...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>> danieldi...@gmail.com
>>
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com

Reply via email to