I support your vision.

Rejection of LENr is not conspiracy of evil, but closed-mindness of those
who have the data, and conformism of others...
Some self delusion to hide that shame close the story.


2013/6/27 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>

> Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The LENR developer will have a hard time in the U.S. to counter this
>> geopolitical situation. . . .
>>
> The U.S. will use its soft power to counter LENR development. For example,
>> they might use a stuxnet computer virus attack to slow up LENR development
>> in a LENR development facility.
>>
> I doubt it! I think this scenario is highly unrealistic for two reasons:
>
> 1. As I said, cold fusion will be extremely popular because it will save
> money. Lots of money. More money than any tax-break in history. Word of
> this opposition would soon leak out. About 100 million taxpayers would
> write to their Congressmen and the President demanding that the government
> stop interfering in the research.
>
> I am assuming here that we can rally the public to our side. With public
> support, cold fusion is unstoppable.
>
> 2. The people in the military are not stupid. They will understand that
> military forces equipped with cold fusion will have a tremendous advantage.
> An advantage as large as the British versus the Chinese ships in the Opium
> Wars, or an ironclad ship versus wooden ones in the Battle of Hampton
> Roads, March 8, 1862. In this battle, the ironclad Merrimack sank two U.S.
> navy wooden ships with only a few casualties on the Merrimack. If the U.S.
> had not developed the Monitor in time to counter this, the Merrimack would
> have broken the Union blockade in the Chesapeake Bay and won the war for
> the Confederacy. I mean that one ship would have won the war in a few
> months.
>
> A small army, navy or airforce with cold fusion powered weapons and
> equipment could easily wipe out the U.S. military in a few weeks, the way
> the Germans destroyed Poland and France in 1939 and 1940. The people in the
> U.S. and British military realize this. They assisted me when I wrote
> chapter 11 in my book, about weapons. I only scratched the surface. Any
> military expert could write hundreds of pages more.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to