With the renaissance of the U.S. energy prospects in the coming decades, geopolitical considerations will discourage the American government from throwing that strategic advantage away for an egalitarian energy source.
The U.S. can gain great geopolitical co-operation from both friend and foe by threatening to cut off their life giving energy spigot. In the Coming decades, The U.S. will become the beating heart of the world wide industrial complex with the U.S. trading its huge energy resources for the natural mineral resources of other countries. The U.S, will justify spending huge sums to continue its predominance in military strength to protect its energy supplies. Other countries will want to go to nuclear energy to offset the U.S. energy hegemony. The U.S. will resist that trend to make the power of its energy resources more potent and to discourage proliferation. The LENR developer will have a hard time in the U.S. to counter this geopolitical situation. The LENR developer should pick an energy poor country that will support LENR development as a industrial strategy to counter the U.S. energy agenda. The U.S. will attempt to stop LENR by imposing NRC and IAEA worldwide sanctions on LENR as a dangerous nuclear energy platform. The U.S. will use its soft power to counter LENR development. For example, they might use a stuxnet computer virus attack to slow up LENR development in a LENR development facility. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Zell <[email protected]> wrote: > > ** >> Beware of your logic - because if you break up the opposition into >> factions, you cannot deny that some of them might be violent and open to >> the possibility that disruptive tech is about to emerge. >> > > I agree this is possible. I think full openness should prevent it. I hope > so! You can't suppress something that has been patented and published > worldwide on dozens of websites. > > > >> Again, it is best that Rossi is thought to be a fraud in the mainstream. >> > > I think Rossi agrees. I sort of agree. In some ways, at this stage, it is > better that most people should ignore him. > > On the other hand I wish he would open up more because some members of the > mainstream want to fund his work. I know some who say they do. I trust them. > > It is frustrating. > > - Jed > >
