If the U.S. military industrial complex got exclusive hold of LENR, they would classify it as top secret. The military would begin a maskirovka campaign to cover any knowledge of LENR.
This is usually achieved by creating or amplifying an artificial fog of war via psychological operations, information warfare, visual deception and other methods. As a form of strategic use of information (disinformation), it overlaps with psychological warfare. To the degree that any enemy that falls for the deception will lose confidence when it is revealed, he may hesitate when confronted with the truth. This was done doing development of secret aircraft. The Air Force floated a UFO speculation to cover aircraft development. The military will connect LENR with nuclear danger and an insidious tritium radiation threat. This is hard to counter with a top secret technology. If a person got hold of a LENR reactor, they would soon die a cancer. Truth has no bearing on this sort of disinformation; it is the BIG LIE approach to public relations. Remember how the Iraq war was sold. September 5, 2002: In a White House Iraq Group (WHIG) meeting, chief Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson proposes the use of a "smoking gun/mushroom cloud" metaphor to sell the American public on the supposed nuclear dangers posed by Saddam Hussein. According to Newsweek columnist Michael Isikoff, "The original plan had been to place it in an upcoming presidential speech, but WHIG members fancied it so much that when the Times reporters contacted the White House to talk about their upcoming piece [about aluminum tubes], one of them leaked Gerson's phrase — and the administration would soon make maximum use of it." On CNN, Condi Rice acknowledged that "there will always be some uncertainty" in determining how close Iraq may be to obtaining a nuclear weapon but said, "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." February 5, 2003: Colin Powell addresses the United Nations, asserting that there was "no doubt in my mind" that Saddam was working to obtain key components to produce nuclear weapons. CHRIS MATTHEWS: “…back in the 60s, we calls such people pigs. Pigs. No, really. They don't care about the planet, they don't care about the destruction of war. All they want is what they got, their stuff, and they want more of it. Is that what we're facing here, just greed? I'm not talking about the guy at the coal mind, that's hard work. I'm talking about people who won't listen to you, won't listen to science because they want more stuff.” On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The LENR developer will have a hard time in the U.S. to counter this >> geopolitical situation. . . . >> > The U.S. will use its soft power to counter LENR development. For example, >> they might use a stuxnet computer virus attack to slow up LENR development >> in a LENR development facility. >> > I doubt it! I think this scenario is highly unrealistic for two reasons: > > 1. As I said, cold fusion will be extremely popular because it will save > money. Lots of money. More money than any tax-break in history. Word of > this opposition would soon leak out. About 100 million taxpayers would > write to their Congressmen and the President demanding that the government > stop interfering in the research. > > I am assuming here that we can rally the public to our side. With public > support, cold fusion is unstoppable. > > 2. The people in the military are not stupid. They will understand that > military forces equipped with cold fusion will have a tremendous advantage. > An advantage as large as the British versus the Chinese ships in the Opium > Wars, or an ironclad ship versus wooden ones in the Battle of Hampton > Roads, March 8, 1862. In this battle, the ironclad Merrimack sank two U.S. > navy wooden ships with only a few casualties on the Merrimack. If the U.S. > had not developed the Monitor in time to counter this, the Merrimack would > have broken the Union blockade in the Chesapeake Bay and won the war for > the Confederacy. I mean that one ship would have won the war in a few > months. > > A small army, navy or airforce with cold fusion powered weapons and > equipment could easily wipe out the U.S. military in a few weeks, the way > the Germans destroyed Poland and France in 1939 and 1940. The people in the > U.S. and British military realize this. They assisted me when I wrote > chapter 11 in my book, about weapons. I only scratched the surface. Any > military expert could write hundreds of pages more. > > - Jed > >
