Hardly the criticism of the comments here isn't much better. You guys are just resorting to pointless insults.
I will say one thing about the paper, they're very very right on front. The so called "independent investigators" are not the right ones to be doing black box testing as they are hardly experts on calorimetry. Also, the so called "independent investigators" repeat the claim the 'black box' is made of hydroden and nickel. If it was a black box and this was actually an independent report why would they state something as fact they could not verify themselves? On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jed Rothwell **** > > ** ** > > This paper says:**** > > **** > > We note first of all that the circumstances and people involved in the > test make if far from being an independent one.**** > > ** ** > > This is in a physics paper!?! What an outrageous thing to say. Where are > they trying to publish, in the National Enquirer?**** > > ** ** > > That's incredible. Outlandish. And completely false.**** > > ** ** > > You lose all credibility when you publish this kind of garbage in the > guise of a physics paper. **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > What a pair of arrogant buffoons these two are. **** > > ** ** > > One suspects the intent is to uphold the reputation of the Svedberg > Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden; but instead – in looking at their > own lightweight publications and their prior goonish criticism of Cardone – > it seem their main function at this once fine Lab is to act as “enforcer” > (for those of you who understand ice hockey)**** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
