It is obvious that their model does not simulate the Rossi results. I find it humorous that they suggest that the two curves from the Rossi test must have been synchronized for display since they are not what was expected! Perhaps someone should ask them why is their result expected when it does not include internally generated heat? This idea of theirs is backwards.
These guys are clearly coming from a position that assumes that Rossi is perpetrating a scam. They can not accept any evidence that does not support that conclusion. How sad. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Jun 28, 2013 2:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:arXiv:1306.6364 Comments on the report "Indications of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder" > From: "Alan Fletcher" <[email protected]> > Their COMSOL simulation seems to generate the cyclic "waveform" from > the resistive heating only (fig 1). Of course, they don't show THEIR > model. It might be in the coupling between the resistors and the > ceramic. Conductive? Radiative? Even adding a coupling RC stage between the resistor and the ceramic I get nothing like their curve. I suspect that they applied the heater input to the center.
