blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven this > year? >
It has already been proven. The best proof is this absurd paper by Ericsson & Pomp. This is the best effort by skeptics to disprove the paper and it utterly fails. Such weak arguments are tantamount to admitting they have no case. This paper resembles Morrison's best attempt to disprove Fleischmann, which was so bad it proved beyond any doubt Morrison was completely wrong. See: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanreplytothe.pdf The only bet would be: Will blaze spinnaker / Mary Yugo / Göran Ericsson, Stephan Pomp believe the data, or will they continue to spin absurd excuses to ignore it? I would bet that they will continue to spin excuses. The only way they will stop spinning excuses will be if the establishment agrees that Rossi's device is real. I mean the entire establishment, including the DoE and the New York Times. Not just ELFORSK. That is highly unlikely. I do not actually bet money. It is against my principles. I have devoted a large part of my life to this business so I do not think I need to establish my sincerity by betting. Or my bona fides. If Mr. Spinnaker would like to prove he is serious, he will address the technical issue about the model, raised here by Alan Fletcher. - Jed
