You go, girl!
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:41 PM, blaze spinnaker
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe that Essen and Levi were not skeptical, independent investigators
> and that Rossi had plenty of opportunity to rig the test or, less likely,
> they made optimistic measurements.
>
> That seems more probable to me then that this narcissistic fool has
> discovered the solution that will change the future for everyone on planet
> earth.
>
> That being said, I'd probably take the other side of the bet if someone gave
> me 30-1 odds
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Rossi, however, I am willing to bet is a dangerous fool that undermines
>>> the LENR community and its credibility.
>>
>>
>> Rossi is not the issue any more. You are betting that Focardi, Levi and
>> the other six are gullible fools who know nothing about how to do
>> experiments. You are wrong about that. Their paper proves they know what
>> they are doing.
>>
>> The paper by Ericsson & Pomp and the comments by people such as Shanahan
>> at Forbes prove that the skeptics do not have a leg to stand on. They cannot
>> think of a single valid objection to the Levi paper. If they could, they
>> would. If YOU could, you would, instead of flailing around with these absurd
>> arguments that people who know nothing about research should by magic ESP
>> know all about. Ask yourself: What are E&P saying? That Levi should have
>> built his own IR camera from scratch instead of using a commercial one and
>> comparing it to a thermocouple. Is that really the kind of argument you want
>> to hang your hat on? Do you really believe those nitwits?!? Have you ever
>> read more absurd arguments in you life? (Okay go read Morrison versus
>> Fleischmann . . . and you will.)
>>
>> Or take Shanahan's argument that he will not believe the thermocouple
>> tracked the IR camera until he sees every single data point. Being told "it
>> stayed within two degrees" is somehow magically not informative enough for
>> him. Don't you see that he is making excuses and evading the issue? And
>> making a fool of himself!
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>
